01
Long-form
Essays and case write-ups.
AI
AI scores long-form text, audio, and video against your criteria — context, coherence, domain relevance, and delivery — consistently and audit-friendly.
Trusted by 5,000+ hiring teams worldwide.
Trusted by organizations building high-performing teams
3,400+
role-specific assessments
1,80,000+
validated questions
5,000+
paying customers
60+
countries served
You set the standards. Xobin applies them the same way at 11PM and 11AM, then shows the rationale next to the clip or essay.
01
Essays and case write-ups.
02
Audio and video answers.
03
You define; AI executes.
04
Less rater drift across a large cohort.
05
Why the score moved.
06
Always available.
01
Paste a JD or pick a template. Xobin maps skills, weightings, and the right question mix.
02
Candidates get a branded experience. AI proctoring, randomization, and localisation run by default.
03
Fitment scores, AI summaries, and benchmarks land on a shared dashboard — not in a zip of PDFs.
04
Automate shortlists, schedule interviews, and keep every rater on the same scorecard.
| Spreadsheets & tools | Xobin | |
|---|---|---|
| Skill signal | Resumes and gut feel | Role-mapped assessments + fitment |
| Integrity | Honor system | Multi-layer AI proctoring |
| Interviews | Calendar ping-pong | Agentic, live, and one-way in one suite |
| Analytics | Export and hope | CXO-ready reports and benchmarks |
| Scale | Breaks past a few hundred | Hackathons and enterprise volume |
Trusted by 5,000+ hiring teams worldwide
“We stopped guessing at first-round quality. Scorecards, proctoring, and interview notes now live in one place — and time-to-shortlist dropped from weeks to days.”
“Campus drives used to mean chaos. Xobin ran thousands of concurrent tests with a live leaderboard and a report our hiring managers actually read.”
“White-label assessments let us package evaluation as a service. Clients see our brand; we see the evidence.”
Yes. It is decision support.
Communication stack plus 15-language localisation on the platform.
Coding has its own quality analysis; Evaluate covers qualitative responses.
Pair with structured rubrics and human sampling.